The problem
They cover the entire attack surface quickly, but test generic vulnerability patterns. They don't understand what the application actually does, so they miss business-logic flaws, broken authorisation, or attacks that depend on chaining several steps together.
An experienced consultant brings context, creativity and judgement that no tool replicates. But coverage is limited by the length of the engagement and by the experience of whoever performs it.
It's in that gap — deep, contextual, methodical testing, done at scale — that the vulnerabilities that cost a company the most tend to hide.
The solution
Basilisk plans, executes, validates and reports on security tests against your target, following the same recognised methodologies a senior pentester would use, OWASP WSTG for web, MASVS for mobile and the API Security Top 10 for APIs.
The contextual reasoning of a manual engagement: the agents understand what the application does before they test it.
The reproducibility and throughput of a platform: the same testing discipline, across the entire attack surface, every time.
Market-standard methodology applied in every run, not just a checklist at kickoff.
How it works
Five phases, with a specialist overseeing the most important decision points throughout.
Attack-surface discovery, with a baseline sweep of known CVEs and default credentials running in parallel.
A test plan designed specifically for the application, not a generic checklist.
Methodical execution, category by category, following the applicable methodology, with continuous oversight.
Every finding is independently reproduced before it moves on to the report.
Client-ready documentation, with reproduction evidence and concrete recommendations.
Quality
One agent finds, another verifies independently. No finding reaches the client without being reproduced against the real target.
The validator independently re-runs every submitted finding against the target.
Confirmed impact is rated with CVSS 4.0, with the full vector documented.
Only verified findings move forward. Results that can't be confirmed are discarded before reporting.
Differentiator
A transfer endpoint that accepts negative amounts. A cart that lets discounts stack to a negative total. These are domain-specific flaws that translate directly into losses, and that generic tests don't catch. The strategist adapts the tests to the application, based on context supplied by the operator or detected automatically.

Amount manipulation, limit and balance bypass, precision attacks, race conditions in transactions.

Price manipulation, discount stacking, quantity abuse, shipping and tax bypass.

Manipulation of clinical records, prescription tampering, overbooking, claims modification.

Plan and seat-limit bypass, quota manipulation, trial and billing abuse.
Operational security
The most common question before authorising any automated test. Here are the answers.
A transparent gateway sits between every agent and the target. Hosts out of scope stay unreachable.
The platform monitors target health and automatically slows or pauses testing whenever it shows signs of strain.
Potentially destructive flows are confined to disposable users in a sandbox. Every credential is re-verified after any change.
Credentials are tracked by a state machine. On any deviation, the test pauses for review instead of continuing inconsistently.
What you get
Detailed vulnerability report with exploitation evidence, risk, CVSS, impact, recommendations and references, fully available online on our vulnerability management platform, with over a decade of maturity supporting the full pentesting lifecycle, streamlining remediation management, vulnerability tracking and revalidation.
Follow the agents' full decision path throughout the engagement.
Re-run only the tests that failed, to confirm the fixes actually solved the problem.
Where it fits
AI and consultants cover different dimensions of risk. AI brings breadth and cadence; the senior consultant goes deep on what's critical, complex, or already in production.